Lloyd D. Shepherd - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

          Background                                                                  
               Respondent issued a notice of deficiency to Lloyd D.                   
          Shepherd (petitioner) determining deficiencies in and additions             
          to his Federal income taxes for the taxable years and in the                
          amounts as follows:                                                         
                                   Additions to Tax                                   
                                   Sec.        Sec.         Sec.                      
          Year   Deficiency   6651(a)   6653(a)(1)      6654                          
               1988     $4,994    $1,248.50    $249.70     $320.74                    
               1989      5,553     1,388.25       --        376.04                    
          1990      5,385     1,346.25       --        393.91                         
          1991      5,811     1,452.75       --        334.24                         
          1992      5,722     1,430.50       --        249.56                         
          1993      3,449       862.25       --        144.50                         
          The notice of deficiency includes an explanation that, in the               
          absence of adequate records, respondent reconstructed                       
          petitioner's taxable income for the years in issue based upon an            
          indirect method of proof.                                                   
          Petitioner invoked this Court's jurisdiction by filing a                    
          timely petition for redetermination.2  Respondent filed a timely            
          answer to the petition.                                                     
          Respondent subsequently served petitioner with a request for                
          admissions (with attached exhibits) pursuant to Rule 90(a), and             
          filed the same with the Court pursuant to Rule 90(b).  Petitioner           
          failed to respond to respondent's request for admissions.  As a             
          consequence, each matter set forth therein is deemed admitted               

               2  At the time that the petition was filed, petitioner                 
          resided at Union City, Indiana.                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011