Deborah K. Skyrms - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          the section 6659 additions to tax for all years at issue except             
          1981.  Thus, the issues remaining for decision are:  (1) Whether            
          the period for assessment of the additions to tax expired prior             
          to the issuance of the respective notices of deficiency in this             
          case;3 (2) whether petitioner is liable for the additions to tax            
          under section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for each of the years 1979,                
          1980, 1981, and 1982; and (3) whether petitioner is liable for              
          the addition to tax under section 6659 for the year 1981.                   
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of settled issues, the stipulation of facts, and            
          the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by reference.                 
          Petitioner resided in Tampa, Florida, when the petition was filed           
          in this case.                                                               
          Background                                                                  
               The parties agree that this case is part of a "tax shelter             
          project" involving plastics recycling machines and that                     
          petitioner, through a partnership, took deductions and credits              
          relating to recycling machines.                                             
               Petitioner is a 1971 graduate of Florida State University.             
          From her graduation in 1971 through the year 1980, petitioner was           
          employed in increasingly more responsible positions by Maas                 
          Brothers Department Store (Maas Bros).  Petitioner described Maas           


          3At trial, petitioner in an Amendment to Petition raised as                 
          a defense the period of the statute of limitations.                         
          Concurrently, petitioner filed a motion to dismiss that we                  
          recharacterized as a motion for summary judgment and denied.                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011