Eli T. Sleiman, Jr. and Janie L. Sleiman, et al. - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          activities.  Peter is an attorney admitted to practice in the               
          State of Florida.  He handles all of the real estate development            
          paperwork, including the negotiations of financing and leasing              
          arrangements.  Anthony is responsible for locating desirable                
          property sites.  Respondent's adjustments that remain in issue              
          relate to three real estate development projects that Eli, Peter,           
          and Anthony operated through three corporations, REE, TNE, and              
          ME, each of which had elected to be treated as an S corporation             
          under section 1362(a).                                                      
          REE                                                                         
               During 1991 and 1992, Eli was the sole shareholder of REE,             
          which was incorporated on August 21, 1991, in the State of                  
          Florida.  REE was organized to purchase and develop property and            
          to lease it to Blockbuster Video, Inc. (Blockbuster), which had             
          entered into a lease agreement with Eli, dated July 30, 1991.               
          Eli later assigned the lease to REE.3                                       
               On October 23, 1991, REE purchased property located at 910             
          Dunn Avenue (the Dunn property) in Jacksonville, Florida.  The              
          Dunn property was formerly the site of a gasoline station and               
          required substantial environmental remediation due to land                  
          contamination problems.                                                     

          3         In their reply brief, petitioners object to                       
          respondent's proposed finding of this fact on the ground that               
          respondent failed to prove that Eli assigned the lease to REE.              
          Petitioners, however, did not submit any evidence that supports             
          their objection.  After reviewing the record, the Court is not              
          persuaded that such an assignment did not in fact occur.                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011