Terry D. Smith - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          whether the escrow agreement between petitioner and Essex was               
          oral or written.                                                            
             3. Handling of the Proceeds From the Sale of Both Properties             
             In a letter dated March 2, 1990, Essex confirmed that he                 
          invested petitioner's share of the proceeds from the Seventh                
          Street property ($30,072) in a certificate of deposit with the              
          Bank of Mecklenburg.  Around March 20, 1990, KCLH transferred the           
          proceeds from the sale of petitioner's interest in the Monroe               
          Road property ($9,882), by check drawn on KCLH's trust account to           
          Essex's law firm.  Essex added those proceeds to the certificate            
          of deposit with the Bank of Mecklenburg.                                    
          C. Petitioner's Purchase of the East Boulevard Property                     
             On February 27, 1990, H.P. Smith (Smith), a real estate                  
          broker with MECA properties, took petitioner to tour property at            
          910 East Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina (the East Boulevard           
          property), and gave him some preliminary information about the              
          building.  The East Boulevard property was well-located for                 
          petitioner's accounting practice.  East Boulevard was one of two            
          streets in Charlotte on which petitioner was considering buying             
          replacement property.  It appeared that the property could                  
          possibly be suitable for petitioner, but there were several                 
          points that had to be resolved.  First, the East Boulevard                  
          property needed to be substantially rehabilitated to make it                
          usable.  Second, petitioner thought the sellers' price was too              
          high.  Third, petitioner wanted to structure the financing with a           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011