Melrel L. Stephens - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          must also keep sufficient records to substantiate any deduction             
          that would otherwise be allowed by the Code.  Sec. 6001;                    
          New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 (1934).                
               With respect to the $3,000 charitable contribution reported            
          on her 1993 Form 1040, petitioner argues that she is entitled to            
          deduct this amount on account of a $3,000 donation to B-Ball in             
          1993.  Petitioner relies solely on her testimony to support her             
          claim to this deduction.                                                    
               We find petitioner's testimony inconsistent and                        
          unpersuasive.  Petitioner testified that she paid "approximately            
          $3,000" to B-Ball; however, she was unable to state unequivocally           
          when she purportedly paid this amount.  Petitioner testified that           
          she was unsure whether she paid the $3,000 amount in one or                 
          several installments.  Petitioner later testified that she had              
          $3,000 in cash when she attended a B-Ball meeting, and that she             
          gave it to one of B-Ball's representatives at that time.                    
          Petitioner's lack of detailed books, records, and receipts                  
          precludes the Court from reaching a determination of what (if               
          anything) was given to B-Ball.  Even if we could arrive at such a           
          determination, petitioner would still not be entitled to the                
          disputed deduction.  Petitioner has not proven that B-Ball was a            
          qualified recipient under section 170(c)(2).2  See McGahen v.               


          2 Although petitioner does not argue that she can deduct the                
          $3,000 amount given to the Most Worshipful United Grand Lodge               
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011