Tebarco Mechanical Corporation - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
               In Asphalt Prods. Co. v. Commissioner, supra at 849, the               
          court noted that an insignificant increase in inventories may be            
          grounds for finding an abuse of discretion by the Commissioner.             
          However, the court found no such abuse of discretion in that case           
          given the size of the taxpayer's receivables combined with its              
          failure to account for inventories.  Id.  See also Thompson                 
          Elec., Inc. v. Commissioner, supra (cash method did not produce             
          substantial identity of results where for 1988 and 1989,                    
          petitioner's taxable income computed under the cash method was              
          $138,418 and $135,958, respectively, while taxable income                   
          computed under the accrual method was $331,925 and $289,039,                
          respectively); Surtronics, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra (cash                
          method did not produce substantially identical results to the               
          accrual method, where the difference in net income for the period           
          involved was $198,000).                                                     
               For fiscal year 1990, petitioner's taxable income under the            
          cash method of accounting was $54,128.  Petitioner's taxable                
          income under the accrual method of accounting would be $328,549.            
          Thus, petitioner's taxable income under the accrual method                  
          increased by $274,421 for the taxable year in issue.  This                  
          difference is not inconsequential; the two methods do not produce           
          substantially identical results.  Thompson Elec., Inc. v.                   
          Commissioner, supra; J. P. Sheahan Associates, Inc. v.                      
          Commissioner, supra.                                                        






Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011