William Roger and Joan Ann Thorpe - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

                    (c) Damages received on account of personal                       
               injuries or sickness.  * * *  The term "damages                        
               received (whether by suit or agreement)" means an                      
               amount received * * * through prosecution of a legal                   
               suit or action based upon tort or tort type rights, or                 
               through a settlement agreement entered into in lieu of                 
               such prosecution.                                                      
               Thus, an amount may be excluded from gross income only when            
          it was received both: (1) Through prosecution or settlement of an           
          action based upon tort or tort-type rights; and (2) on account of           
          personal injuries or sickness.  Commissioner v. Schleier, supra;            
          Wesson v. United States, 48 F.3d 894, 901-902 (5th Cir. 1995);              
          Bagley v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 396, 416 (1995).                           
               When damages are received pursuant to a settlement                     
          agreement, the nature of the claim that was the actual basis for            
          settlement controls whether such damages are excludable under               
          section 104(a)(2).  United States v. Burke, 504 U.S. 229, 237               
          (1992); Thompson v. Commissioner, 866 F.2d 709, 711 (4th Cir.               
          1989), affg. 89 T.C. 632 (1987); Robinson v. Commissioner, 102              
          T.C. 116, 126 (1994), affd. in part, revd. in part 70 F.3d 34               
          (5th Cir. 1995).  "[T]he critical question is, in lieu of what              
          was the settlement amount paid?"  Bagley v. Commissioner, supra             
          at 406.                                                                     
               Determination of the nature of the claim is factual.  Bagley           
          v. Commissioner, supra; Stocks v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 1, 11               
          (1992).  The first requirement is the existence of a claim based            
          upon tort or tort-type rights.  Commissioner v. Schleier, supra             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011