O.H. Tolley, Jr. and Betty Tolley - Page 2

                                          2                                           
          1992 in the amount of $574.  After a concession,2 the issue for             
          decision is whether petitioner Betty Tolley was an active                   
          participant in a qualified retirement plan during 1992, thus                
          precluding a deduction of $2,000 for a contribution by O.H.                 
          Tolley, Jr., to an individual retirement account (IRA).                     
               The facts have been fully stipulated and are so found.  The            
          stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated             
          herein by this reference.  Petitioners resided in Pamplin,                  
          Virginia, at the time their petition was filed.  References to              
          petitioner are to Betty Tolley.                                             
               Petitioner was employed by S.H. Heironimus Co., Inc.                   
          (Heironimus).  Heironimus provided retirement benefits for its              
          employees in the form of a profit-sharing and savings plan (the             
          plan).  During 1992, petitioner made no contributions to the                
          plan.  During that same year, plan forfeitures in the amount of             
          $16.12 were allocated to petitioner's plan account.                         
               On their Federal income tax return filed for the tax year              
          1992, petitioners claimed a contribution deduction in the amount            
          of $2,000.  Petitioners reported adjusted gross income before the           
          IRA contribution deduction in the amount of $54,940.24.                     
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed                     
          petitioners' IRA contribution deduction because petitioner was              
          covered by a retirement plan at work.  Therefore, applying                  

          2    Petitioners concede that they failed to report $22 of                  
          taxable interest income received in 1992.                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011