William J. Tully - Page 6

                                       - 6 -                                          
          return, petitioner and Mrs. Tully reported Mrs. Tully’s net wages           
          received from the State Teacher’s Retirement System and the                 
          Ontario-Montclair School District in the amount of $24,527.39.              
          On their 1992 return, petitioner and Mrs. Tully reported Mrs.               
          Tully’s interest income, received from the Ontario School                   
          Employee Credit Union, in the amount of $124.                               
               With the 1992 return, petitioner filed a Schedule C,                   
          Statement of Profit and Loss from Business, for All American                
          Financial Services (All American).  On his Schedule C, petitioner           
          stated that All American was a sole proprietorship in the                   
          business of financial consulting and marketing.  On his Schedule            
          C, petitioner reported gross receipts derived from All American             
          in the amount of $18,500.  During the taxable year 1992,                    
          petitioner received at least $639,000 of income, derived from his           
          business of establishing exempt organizations.  Thus, petitioner            
          earned and intentionally failed to report Schedule C income in              
          the amount of $620,500.                                                     
               Petitioner fraudulently and with the intent to evade income            
          tax understated taxable income for the 1992 taxable year in the             
          amount of $620,500.  Petitioner fraudulently and with the intent            
          to evade income tax understated his tax liability for the taxable           
          year 1992 in the amount of $176,399.                                        
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined, inter              
          alia, that petitioners omitted $620,500 of income.  Consistent              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011