Arthur Turco - Page 5

                                          5                                           
          paid during the 2 years immediately preceding the filing of the             
          refund claim (2-year look-back period).  Secs. 6512(b) and                  
          6511(b)(2)(B).  Before we can determine whether petitioners are             
          entitled to refunds of their 1989, 1990, and 1991 overpayments,             
          we must determine whether and when petitioners filed Federal                
          income tax returns and/or refund claims.                                    
               A.  Whether Petitioners Filed Tax Returns                              
               Respondent determined that petitioners did not file Federal            
          income tax returns for 1989, 1990, and 1991.  Petitioners, who              
          bear the burden of proof, contend that they filed the appropriate           
          tax returns twice.  Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S.               
          111, 115 (1933).  They assert that Mr. Turco mailed timely                  
          returns for each year in question. The IRS, however, has no                 
          record that it received returns from petitioners for these years.           
          Moreover, petitioners have not established that they mailed the             
          returns in question.                                                        
               Petitioners further contend that they filed, for a second              
          time, when Mr. Turco delivered photocopies of their returns to              
          Agent McClaughlin.  A return is valid only if it is verified                
          under penalty of perjury by an original signature and filed in              
          the appropriate office.  Sec. 6061; Beard v. Commissioner, 82               
          T.C. 766 (1984), affd. 793 F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1986); sec. 1.6061-           
          1(a), Income Tax Regs.  Petitioners urge the Court to ignore the            
          signature and place of filing requirements.  We decline to do so            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011