- 3 - payments. In a subsequent garnishment proceeding, on or about March 18, 1992, Kathleen J. Vorwald was awarded a judgment in the amount of $8,483.25 against Deer Valley. Pursuant to this judgment, Deer Valley was ordered to transfer $8,483.25 from the IRA to Kathleen J. Vorwald, which transfer apparently took place during 1992. Petitioner did not become aware that his former spouse garnished his IRA until he was so notified by respondent during the course of the examination that eventually led to this proceeding. In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that the amount paid to Kathleen J. Vorwald by Deer Valley from the IRA pursuant to the garnishment proceeding constitutes a distribution to petitioner that is includable in his 1992 income. Respondent further determined that the distribution is subject to the additional tax imposed by section 72(t). Discussion We first consider whether under the circumstances present in this case, the transfer of the funds from the IRA to petitioner's former spouse is tantamount to a distribution from the IRA to petitioner. For the following reasons, we find that it is. Because the transfer of funds from the IRA to petitioner's former spouse at least partially discharged a legal obligation he owed to her, the transfer to her is the equivalent of receipt by him. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716, 729Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011