- 7 - respondent's position on the statute of limitations question, but we are not prepared to say that respondent was not substantially justified in urging that position. See Estate of Wall v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 391, 394 (1994). Because we have held that petitioner has not proven that respondent's position was not substantially justified, we need not address the other requirements provided in section 7430. Therefore, An appropriate order and decision will be entered.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: May 25, 2011