Harold Wapnick - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

          of the 1985, 1986, and 1987 taxable years and that part of such             
          underpayment is due to fraud within the meaning of section                  
          6653(b).  We agree.  Under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, a           
          judgment in a prior proceeding precludes litigation, in a second            
          proceeding, of issues actually litigated and necessary to the               
          outcome of the first proceeding.  Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore,            
          439 U.S. 322, 326 (1979); Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C.             
          202, 213 (1992).  A criminal conviction under section 7201 based            
          upon a charge of willful attempt to evade tax necessarily                   
          involves the ultimate factual determinations necessary for a                
          finding of fraud under section 6653(b); namely, that part of the            
          underpayment for the taxable year in issue was due to fraud.                
          Amos v. Commissioner, 43 T.C. 50, 54-56 (1964), affd. 360 F.2d              
          358 (4th Cir. 1965).  Thus, petitioner is precluded from                    
          disputing that part of the underpayment of his income tax is due            
          to fraud for purposes of section 6653(b) for each of the years in           
          issue.                                                                      
               Many of petitioner's arguments appear to be based on the               
          fact that in the prior criminal proceeding the Government did not           
          prove the exact amount of income received by him or the exact               
          amount of tax owed by him.  A determination of the amount of the            
          underpayment is not an element for a criminal conviction under              
          section 7201, nor is it a precondition for use of collateral                
          estoppel on the issue of fraud under section 6653(b).  Further,             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011