Robert L. Whitmire - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                          
          things, of transferring ownership1 of the computer equipment                 
          (subject to the secured interests therein of MHLC) to Petunia                
          Leasing Associates (Petunia), the equipment leasing partnership              
          in which petitioner invested and through which petitioner now                
          claims the losses and expenses at issue in this case.                        
               In the first transaction, Alanthus sold the computer                    
          equipment and assigned its interest as lessor in the end-user                
          lease to F/S Computer Corp. (F/S Computer).  Immediately                     
          following that transaction, F/S Computer resold the computer                 
          equipment to F.S. Venture Corp. (F.S. Venture).  F.S. Venture                
          then resold the computer equipment to the Petunia partnership.               
          MHLC’s security interests in the computer equipment and in the               
          payments due from the end user under the end-user lease were not             
          affected by any of these transactions.                                       
               Alanthus sold the computer equipment to F/S Computer for the            
          stated price of $2,122,329, of which $267,288 was paid in cash.              
          As payment for the balance of the purchase price, F/S Computer               
          assumed the $1,868,657 principal amount of Alanthus’ debt                    
          obligation to MHLC and the monthly payment obligations to MHLC on            
          the Alanthus Note.                                                           



          1     Use in this opinion of “ownership”, “purchase”, “sale”, and            
          other words that normally suggest economic and legal ownership of            
          property, or the transfer of same, is for convenience only and               
          does not constitute any finding or conclusion as to which entity             
          should be regarded, for income tax purposes, as the owner of the             
          computer equipment.                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011