Robert J. and Anne L. Wilson - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                          
          income-producing property.  Sec. 212(3); Page v. Commissioner,               
          T.C. Memo. 1993-398, affd. 58 F.3d 1342 (8th Cir. 1995).                     
               In 1989, petitioners received a condemnation award and paid             
          attorney fees of $26,341 in connection with the condemnation                 
          proceedings.  Petitioners treated the condemnation award as tax              
          free under section 1033.  Accordingly, petitioners did not deduct            
          the attorney's fees because they thought they were precluded from            
          doing so, as the fees were allocable to what they believed to be             
          tax-free income.  Sec. 1.212-1(e), Income Tax Regs.                          
               In Wilson I, we held that the condemnation award received by            
          petitioners in 1989 did not qualify for nonrecognition treatment             
          under section 1033.  Therefore, the condemnation award was                   
          includable in petitioners' income for 1989.  As petitioners are              
          required to include the condemnation award in their taxable                  
          income for 1989, they are also entitled to claim a deduction for             
          the legal expenses incurred in litigating the condemnation                   
          dispute.  Accordingly, we find that in 1989 petitioners paid and             
          therefore may claim a miscellaneous itemized deduction for                   
          attorney's fees of $26,341.  Sec. 67(a) and (b).                             
          III. Unreported Dividend Income                                              
               In the notice of deficiency for 1989, respondent determined             
          that petitioners had unreported dividend income of $1,677.  On               
          brief, respondent conceded that petitioners had only $573 in                 
          unreported dividend income.  To reflect this concession,                     
          respondent's Rule 155 computation should have subtracted $1,104              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011