- 3 - for decision relate to the tax treatment of payments which were not made and income items which were not received, but which were shown in the books and records of petitioners and these various entities. The specific issues for decision are: 1. Whether Hersco may include in gross income for 1984 $189,014 of capital gain related to the sale of land to WRI, and $100,115 of interest income from WRI related to a mortgage note. We hold that it may not. 2. Whether WRI may deduct, for 1988, $100,138 of interest related to a mortgage note it gave to Hersco and $173,174 for professional services performed by Wise's sole proprietorship, Pro-Ser. We hold that it may not. 3. Whether Wise may include in gross income $231,746 for services Pro-Ser rendered to WRI. We hold that he may not. 4. Whether WRI may deduct $88,825 for services performed by Wise. We hold that it may. 5. Whether WRI's payment of $38,500 to Wise was a non- taxable repayment of a loan. We hold that it was not. 6. Whether $17,197 of expenses reported by Wise on Schedule C of his tax return should be reported on Schedule A. We hold that they should not. 7. Whether Hersco may deduct $73,122 of interest expense related to loans Eicher made to Hersco. We hold that it may not.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011