Zeeman Manufacturing Company, Inc. - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
               To justify an accumulation of earnings and profits, a                  
          taxpayer must (1) indicate that the future needs of the business            
          require such accumulation, and (2) have specific, definite, and             
          feasible plans for the use of such accumulation.  Sec.                      
          1.537-1(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  An accumulation need not be used           
          immediately, nor must the plans for its use be consummated within           
          a short period after the close of the taxable year, provided that           
          such accumulation will be used within a reasonable time depending           
          upon all the facts and circumstances relating to the future needs           
          of the business.  Id.  Where the future needs of the business are           
          uncertain or vague, where the plans for the future use of an                
          accumulation are not specific, definite, and feasible, or where             
          the execution of such a plan is postponed indefinitely, an                  
          accumulation cannot be justified on the grounds of reasonably               
          anticipated needs of the business.  Id.  At trial, respondent may           
          carry the burden of proof by establishing, e.g., that no estimate           
          in fact was made as of the close of a particular fiscal year, or            
          that the estimate was disproportionate to what was reasonably               
          necessary for petitioner's business, or that petitioner's                   
          asserted need was too speculative to be reasonably anticipated.             
          See Yates Petroleum Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-146.             
               For purposes of ruling on the instant motion and to                    
          facilitate our analysis, we accept the grounds and facts asserted           
          in petitioner's statement as if they are true; however, in                  
          deciding the instant motion, we are not called upon to make                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011