Marvin Ziporyn - Page 9

                                          9                                           
          Petitioner's estimated expense is based on an average of the                
          amounts of the four checks which were paid to Illinois Bell.                
          However, petitioner has not introduced any evidence to show that            
          these payments were each for a single month or that the charges             
          were representative of his typical usage.  There is nothing in              
          the record enabling us to determine that petitioner incurred                
          telephone expenses in excess of $1,887.  Respondent is sustained            
          on this issue.                                                              
          Travel, Meals, and Entertainment Expenses                                   
               Section 162(a)(2) allows a deduction for travel expenses,              
          including meals and lodging.  An exception to the Cohan rule is             
          section 274(d), which prohibits the estimation of expenses for              
          travel.  Section 274(d) requires substantiation of travel                   
          expenses either "by adequate records or by sufficient evidence              
          corroborating the taxpayer's own statement".  Sec. 274(d).  The             
          records must show the amount, date, place, and business purpose             
          of each travel expense.  Id.; sec. 1.274-5T(b)(2), Temporary                
          Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).                        
               In order to be deductible as an expense incurred while "away           
          from home", a travel expense must be reasonable and necessary,              
          and incurred in pursuit of business.  Commissioner v. Flowers,              
          326 U.S. 465, 470 (1946).  For purposes of section 162(a)(2),               
          generally a taxpayer's home is his principal place of business.             
          Michaels v. Commissioner, 53 T.C. 269, 273 (1969).  When a                  
          taxpayer has two places of business or employment located a                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011