Phillip Lee Allen and Carolyn F. Allen - Page 7

                                                 - 7 -                                                   

                  Gain or loss realized on the disposition of property                                   
            generally must be recognized as taxable under section 1001(c).                               
            Disposition of property includes the involuntary conversion of                               
            property through condemnation and damage.  Rosenthal v.                                      
            Commissioner, 416 F.2d 491, 498 (2d Cir. 1969), affg. 48 T.C. 515                            
            (1967).  Section 1033 provides an exception, allowing                                        
            nonrecognition of gain realized under specific circumstances.                                
                  To qualify for the section 1033 nonrecognition, the gain                               
            realized must have been:  (1) Compensation for the involuntary                               
            conversion of the taxpayer’s property and (2) expended within a                              
            specified period of time for the replacement of the converted                                
            property with similar property.  Sec. 1033(a)(2)(A) and (B).                                 
                  Here, the parties disagree about the $130,000 received in                              
            settlement of petitioners’ claim against Allstate.  Petitioners                              
            argue that the settlement proceeds were compensation for the                                 
            involuntary conversion of their property and that the                                        
            compensation was expended for repairs to restore the house to its                            
            original condition.  Respondent argues that the payment cannot                               
            qualify for section 1033 treatment because it was not                                        
            compensation for a property loss nor was it used solely to                                   
            replace the involuntarily converted property.  If the payment was                            
            to satisfy a claim for punitive damages, that portion would not                              
            be “compensation” as required by section 1033.  See Lukhard v.                               
            Reed, 481 U.S. 368, 389 (1987) (“Punitive damages * * * are a                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011