Associated Dentists of River Falls, f.k.a. River Falls Dental Associates, Ltd. - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

                    Total                   37,912    36,840                          
               Petitioner also claimed a $2,184 NOL deduction on its 1993             
          tax return.  The return stated that petitioner had sustained a              
          $13,647 NOL in 1992, that it carried back $11,463 of this loss to           
          1989, and that it was carrying forward the rest to 1993.                    
          Respondent disallowed this deduction because, respondent                    
          determined, petitioner had not proven its right to it.                      
                                       OPINION                                        
               We must first decide whether the rent (inclusive of the real           
          estate taxes) that petitioner paid the Schwalbachs for the River            
          Falls building equaled the fair rental value of the premises.1              
          Respondent determined it did not.  Respondent argues that the               
          fair rental value of the leased premises is $7 a square foot, as            
          evidenced by the rental rate that the Schwalbachs charged Dr.               
          Nelson for a portion of the same building.  Petitioner argues               
          that the rent charged Dr. Nelson is not representative of fair              
          rental value and that it may deduct all the rent it paid the                
          Schwalbachs.                                                                
               We agree with petitioner.  Generally, a taxpayer may deduct            
          reasonable rent paid for property used in a trade or business.              
          Sec. 162(a)(3); Milbrew, Inc. v. Commissioner, 710 F.2d 1302,               
          1308 (7th Cir. 1983), affg. T.C. Memo. 1981-610; Limericks, Inc.            


               1 The parties have treated the real estate taxes paid by               
          petitioner as additional rent.  We do likewise.                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011