Estate of Eldon L. Auker, Deceased, Kimberlee J. Auker, Independent Personal Representative - Page 37

                                       - 37 -                                         

        the market for some of those shares.  As explained in an opinion of           
        the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit authored by Judge                 
        Augustus Hand:                                                                
                  It is common knowledge that sales of small lots of                  
             stock on an exchange afford no reliable criterion of value               
             per share for large lots which if disposed of rapidly are                
             likely to flood the market and thus depress the price.                   
             Every skillful broker who wishes to dispose of a block of                
             stock larger than the market is likely to absorb without                 
             sacrifice in price will liquidate slowly by sales of small               
             units.  If he disposes of the stock too slowly, he runs the              
             risk that a recession in current prices may occur and that               
             the prices of his sales may suffer on that account.  If he               
             sells too quickly, he is likely to suffer from forcing an                
             amount of stock on the market which exceeds the normal                   
             demand, so that purchasers will only buy at less than going              
             rates.  That "the size of the gift of any security is not a              
             relevant factor" for consideration in determining market                 
             value, as the Regulations in force in 1936 prescribed, is                
             quite contrary to experience.  If the block is large enough              
             and the market thin, size under ordinary circumstances will              
             certainly count.  To be sure some unusual factor like a                  
             struggle for corporate control might cause a large block to              
             sell at a higher rate than would a small lot had no such                 
             struggle begun, but the size of the block to be offered is               
             surely a matter for consideration in finding value.                      
             [Groff v. Munford, supra at 827.]                                        
             This Court has expanded the concept of blockage to the sale of           
        other assets such as art, Calder v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 713,                
        722-723 (1985) (market absorption discount applied to gifts of a              
        large number of works of art created by one artist); Estate of Smith          
        v, Commissioner, 57 T.C. 650, 658 (1972) (market absorption discount          
        applied to 425 works of art created by and kept in sculptor's                 
        collection), affd. on other grounds 510 F.2d 479 (2d Cir. 1975);              
        Estate of O'Keeffe v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-210 (market               






Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011