-2- First-TierSecond-Tier Additions to Tax Tax Year DeficiencyDeficiencySec. Sec. Sec. Ended Sec. 4975(a) Sec. 4975(b) 6653(a)(1)(A)6653(a)(1)6651(a)(1) 12/31/86 $11,215 -- $560.75 -- $2,803.75 12/31/87 11,215 -- 560.75 -- 2,803.75 12/31/88 11,215 -- -- $560.75 2,803.75 12/31/89 11,215 -- -- -- 2,803.75 12/31/90 11,215 -- -- -- 2,803.75 12/31/91 11,215 -- -- -- 2,803.75 12/31/92 11,215 -- -- -- 2,803.75 12/31/93 11,215 -- -- -- 2,803.75 08/18/94 -- $224,298 -- -- -- This case involves the question of whether an assignment of accounts receivable by petitioner to a defined benefit plan was a prohibited transaction giving rise to an excise tax under section 4975, which was added to the Code by section 2003(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L. 93-406, 88 Stat. 829, 971. More specifically, the issues for decision are: (1) Whether the assignment of an employer's accounts receivable to a defined benefit plan is a prohibited transaction within the meaning of section 4975(c), resulting in petitioner's being liable under section 4975(a); (2) whether the assignment of accounts receivable was not corrected within the meaning of section 4975(f)(5), resulting in petitioner's being liable under section 4975(b); (3) whether petitioner is liable 1(...continued) Procedure. 2 Respondent concedes that petitioner is not subject to the first-tier excise tax of sec. 4975(a) or any additions to tax for the taxable years 1986 and 1987, as determined in the notice of deficiency. Additionally, respondent concedes petitioner is not subject to an addition to tax under sec. 6653(a)(1) for the taxable year ended Dec. 31, 1988.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011