Sharif M. and Amal Battikhi - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          for summary judgment.  We treat this as a concession by                     
          petitioners.  Rothstein v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 488, 497 (1988);           
          Reaves v. Commissioner, 31 T.C. 690, 722 (1958), affd. 295 F.2d             
          336 (5th Cir. 1961).  Also, respondent asked petitioners to admit           
          that they were negligent with respect to the entire underpayment.           
          In their motion to withdraw deemed admissions, which was filed              
          more than 2 months after respondent filed and served the request            
          for admissions, petitioners denied they were negligent.  However,           
          we deem admitted that petitioners were negligent with respect to            
          the entire underpayment.                                                    
               We conclude that petitioners are liable for the accuracy-              
          related penalty for 1992 under section 6662(a) for negligence and           
          that all of the deficiency is due to negligence.                            
               To reflect respondent's concession and the foregoing,                  
                                                  An appropriate order                
                                             and decision will be                     
                                             entered for respondent.                  

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

Last modified: May 25, 2011