Gary K. Bielfeldt and Carlotta J. Bielfeldt - Page 1

                                 T.C. Memo. 1998-394                                  


                               UNITED STATES TAX COURT                                


          GARY K. BIELFELDT AND CARLOTTA J. BIELFELDT, ET AL.,1 Petitioners           
                   v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent                    


               Docket Nos. 5936-96, 6080-96,      Filed November 6, 1998.             
                         6154-96, 6155-96,                                            
                         6156-96, 7264-96,                                            
                         7265-96, 7346-96.                                            
               Timothy C. Frautschi, Maureen A. McGinnity, Elizabeth Staton           
          Idleman, Lloyd J. Dickinson, and Wayman C. Lawrence, IV, for                
          petitioners.                                                                
               Alan M. Jacobson, Joseph T. Ferrick, and David D. Choi,                
          for respondent.                                                             


               1Cases of the following petitioners have been consolidated             
          for purposes of trial, briefing, and opinion:  docket No.                   
          6080-96, Bielfeldt & Company Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, Bank            
          One, Peoria, Trustee, and Bielfeldt & Company, a general                    
          partnership, by Gary K. Bielfeldt; docket No. 6154-96, Linda S.             
          Bielfeldt; docket No. 6155-96, David L. & Julie K. Bielfeldt;               
          docket No. 6156-96, Karen J. Bielfeldt Gray; docket No. 7264-96,            
          Gary K. & Carlotta J. Bielfeldt; docket No. 7265-96, Gary K.                
          Bielfeldt; docket No. 7346-96, David L. & Julie K. Bielfeldt.               
          After trial, however, the parties notified the Court that the               
          issue addressed herein applies only to docket No. 5936-96.                  
          Accordingly, the issue addressed herein applies only to                     
          docket No. 5936-96.                                                         


Page:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011