- 13 - 1967), affg. T.C. Memo. 1965-162; Bernstein v. Commissioner, 267 F.2d 879 (5th Cir. 1959), affg. T.C. Memo. 1956-260; Kurnick v. Commissioner, 232 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1956), affg. per curiam T.C. Memo. 1955-31; Stone v. Commissioner, 22 T.C. 893 (1954). Under the percentage markup method, gross receipts are determined by adding a percentage to the cost of goods sold. The burden of proof is on petitioners to show that respondent's method does not clearly reflect income. Rule 142(a); see sec. 446. Since petitioners did not keep books to show gross receipts from sales, it was permissible for respondent to apply a markup percentage to determine their gross receipts for 1992 and 1993. In 1992, on their Schedule C, petitioners claimed supplies of $1,200 and stated gross receipts of $6,100 (a markup of over 500 percent). Later, petitioners and respondent agreed that the amount of purchases (cost of goods sold) was $29,236. On the basis of the cost of goods sold, respondent asserted that petitioners had gross receipts in 1992 of $48,677 (using the markup of 66.5 percent reflected on petitioners' amended 1993 return). In 1993, on their Schedule C, petitioners listed gross receipts of $17,439 (a markup of 66.1 percent), and in their amended return, they listed gross receipts of $102,000 (a markup of 66.5 percent). As noted above, respondent conceded that the cost of goods sold in 1993 was $61,250. On the basis of the costPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011