Calvert Anesthesia Associates-Pricha Phattiyakul, M.D., P.A. - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

          its plan year ended December 31, 1991, that the trust underlying            
          the Plan (the Trust) was not tax exempt under section 501(a) for            
          the same year, and that respondent was revoking a July 29, 1987,            
          favorable determination letter issued to petitioner in connection           
          with the Plan and the Trust.  The reason stated in the final                
          revocation letter for respondent's action was that petitioner had           
          "failed to provide the information necessary to determine                   
          allowable deductions under IRC Sec. 404, qualification under                
          Sec. 401(a), or the financial condition and operation of the                
          plan."                                                                      
               In a petition that was hand-delivered to this Court on                 
          September 15, 1997, and filed on that day, petitioner petitioned            
          the Court for a declaratory judgment as to the status of the                
          Plan.  Thereafter, the Court filed the instant motion.                      
          Petitioner has responded to this motion by way of an objection,             
          and respondent has responded to petitioner's objection.                     
                                     Discussion                                       
               In a case of first impression, we must decide, as a                    
          jurisdictional matter, the number of days that an employer or               
          other qualified person has to petition this Court for a                     
          declaratory judgment following the issuance of a final revocation           
          letter.  Respondent alleged initially that petitioner, the                  
          employer at hand, had 92 days.  In the response to petitioner's             
          objection, respondent shortens this period by 1 day, alleging               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011