Estate of James T. Campion, Deceased, Leona Campion, Executrix, et al. - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         

               Petitioners’ overriding argument based on the TEFRA                    
          statutory provisions is that this Court's jurisdiction over TEFRA           
          settlement procedures is broader than this Court's jurisdiction             
          over cases in general.  Petitioners point to the "Except as                 
          otherwise provided" language of section 6221 and to the language            
          of section 6224(c)(2).  Petitioners interpret the language of the           
          latter section as providing that once a partnership becomes                 
          subject to the TEFRA provisions for any year and for any purpose,           
          the partnership and each of its partners should be treated, for             
          settlement purposes, as becoming subject to the TEFRA partnership           
          provisions for all years.  Petitioners then argue that under such           
          TEFRA settlement provisions they were entitled in 1994 and later            
          years, when they settled with respondent their particular Elektra           
          Hemisphere tax shelter cases, to be specifically informed of and            
          to take advantage of the most favorable settlement terms that               
          respondent ever offered any of the partners in the Elektra                  
          Hemisphere tax shelters (namely, the cash settlements available             
          during 1986, 1987, and 1989).                                               
               Respondent emphasizes that the no-cash settlements that                
          petitioners now seek to disavow are based on and are consistent             
          with the results of the test cases that were decided with respect           
          to the Elektra Hemisphere tax shelters.  Krause v. Commissioner,            
          99 T.C. 132 (1992); see also Acierno v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          1997-441.  Respondent argues that petitioners (having refused to            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011