- 27 - circumstances of this case, we find that most of the properties with respect to which petitioner received interest income during the years in issue were not properties held by petitioner for sale to customers in the ordinary course of its trade or business. Thus, we find that petitioner is a personal holding company as defined by section 542(a), in each of the years in issue, and is subject to personal holding company tax imposed by section 541, as determined by respondent. Passive Loss Limitation The second issue for decision is whether deductions claimed on petitioner's 1992 return in the amount of $39,186 and deductions claimed on petitioner's 1993 return in the amount of $51,416 are disallowed under section 469(a) as passive activity losses. Resolution of this issue turns on whether the interest income from petitioner's purchase money obligations, described above, is portfolio income because it was not derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business. See sec. 469(e)(1)(A)(i)(I); sec. 1.469-2T(c)(3)(i)(A) and (ii), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 53 Fed. Reg. 5713 (Feb. 25, 1988). If the interest income is not portfolio income, as petitioner contends, then it is taken into account in determining the income or loss from petitioner's rentalPage: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011