Donna C. Clevenger - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          Revenue Service to petitioner's employer on August 14, 1983.  On            
          August 16, 1983, petitioner's employer, the Nuview Union School             
          District, completed and returned Form 3242 to the Internal                  
          Revenue Service in San Diego, California.  As completed, the Form           
          3242 identified petitioner's "current" address as the Apricot               
          address.  Petitioner presented no evidence that she ever sent a             
          copy of the bankruptcy petition to respondent.                              
               This Court repeatedly has held that notification by a third            
          party of a taxpayer's new address is not sufficient to provide              
          respondent with clear and concise notification of a taxpayer's              
          change of address.  See Monge v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 22 (1989)            
          (different addresses on Forms 4868 and 2688); Roy v.                        
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-559 (different address on a                   
          bankruptcy cover sheet); Oak Center v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.             
          1990-633 (Form 2848 where the Form did not expressly provide that           
          the taxpayers' address had changed); Grencewicz v. Commissioner,            
          T.C. Memo. 1990-597 (Forms 1099 and various other interest                  
          statements filed by third parties); White v. Commissioner, T.C.             
          Memo. 1990-528 (a Form W-2 reflecting a different address);                 
          Greenstein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-405 (Forms W-2 and              
          1099-DIV filed by third party payers).  In United States v.                 
          Zolla, 724 F.2d 808 (9th Cir. 1984), the Court of Appeals                   
          indicated that third party notification would be adequate,                  
          stating that "where the taxpayer himself did not communicate the            
          change of address to the IRS, the taxpayer would not be estopped            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011