Franklin P. and Nona Coady - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

          for the Fifth Circuit in Cotnam v. Commissioner, supra.4  See               
          also Baylin v. United States, 43 F.3d 1451, 1455 (Fed. Cir. 1995)           
          (Maryland attorney lien statute does not give attorney an                   
          ownership interest in claim of his or her client); Estate of                
          Gadlow v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 975, 979-980 (1968) (Pennsylvania           
          law distinguishable from Alabama statute applied in Cotnam).                
               We hold that Ms. Coady's award, undiminished by the amount             
          that she paid her attorneys, is includable in petitioners' 1994             
          gross income under the principle of Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111             
          (1930).5  Accord Estate of Gadlow v. Commissioner, supra at                 
          979-980; Petersen v. Commissioner, supra at 151-152; Hardin v.              
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-202; Martinez v. Commissioner,                


               4 The Nebraska provision as set forth in Petersen v.                   
          Commissioner, 38 T.C. 137, 152 n.9 (1962), provided:                        
                    �7-108. Attorney's liens.  An attorney has a                      
                    lien for a general balance of compensation                        
                    upon any papers of his client which have come                     
                    into his possession in the course of his                          
                    professional employment; and upon money in                        
                    his hands belonging to his client, and in the                     
                    hands of the adverse party in an action or                        
                    proceeding in which the attorney was employed                     
                    from the time of giving notice of the lien to                     
                    that party.                                                       
          The South Dakota provision was similar to the Nebraska provision.           
          Id.                                                                         

               5 We reject petitioners' claim that this principle is                  
          inapplicable because Ms. Coady's claim was "contingent" or                  
          "uncertain".  The cases cited by petitioners to support that                
          claim are distinguishable on their facts.                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011