Chris E. Columbus - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         

             claims that this is the "amount collected throughout the                 
             years of the garnishment California placed on the wages".                
             In his trial memorandum, petitioner cites section 7214                   
             relating to offenses by officers and employees of the                    
             United States, as authority for his damage claim.                        
             Furthermore, he asks the Court to allow him to deduct                    
             $9,000 per year to reflect "the impact the events created                
             on his ability to earn income, both past, present and                    
             future * * * in addition to any deductions that are                      
             otherwise authorized."                                                   
                  The Tax Court has limited jurisdiction and may                      
             exercise only the power conferred by statute.  See sec.                  
             7442; Neilson v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 1, 9 (1990)                       
             ("This Court has limited jurisdiction conferred by                       
             statute".).  Petitioner's allegation that respondent's                   
             conduct was improper in some way, such as amounting to a                 
             violation of section 7214, is a matter over which this                   
             Court has no jurisdiction.  Cf. Boger v. Commissioner,                   
             T.C. Memo. 1981-629.  Petitioner has not shown that the                  
             Court has jurisdiction to consider his claim for "damages"               
             under section 7214 or any other law.                                     
                  Moreover, there is nothing in the record, and                       
             petitioner has presented no evidence to substantiate his                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011