Consolidated Manufacturing, Inc., M. P. Long Living Trust, Merl Philip Long, Trustee, Tax Matters Person - Page 69

                                        -69-                                          

               In support of respondent's position that Consolidated                  
          acquired customer cores in purchase transactions, respondent                
          asserts:                                                                    
                    The parties have stipulated that when Consolidated                
               sells a remanufactured automobile part to a customer,                  
               it receives a total sales amount. * * * The total sales                
               amount, consisting of the exchange amount plus core                    
               amount, is taken into income as a cash/credit                          
               transaction. * * * A customer core may or may not                      
               subsequently be acquired by Consolidated at the core                   
               amount.  If it is, this is a separate cash/credit                      
               transaction whereby Consolidated is out-of-pocket the                  
               core amount. * * * The [customer core sales] invoices                  
               * * * use the term "price each", not "refund" or                       
               "deposit" when referring to the value given up by                      
               Consolidated for cores provided to Consolidated by its                 
               customers.  These stipulated facts are not indicative                  
               of an "exchange transaction" as advocated by                           
               petitioner.  These facts also do not support the                       
               proposition that the customer cores are obtained by                    
               Consolidated at little or no out-of-pocket cost.                       
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
                    Petitioner acknowledges that Consolidated's                       
               customers do not generally provide a core to                           
               Consolidated at the time a remanufactured part is sold.                
               In fact, an entire year may go by before a customer                    
               provides a core.  Nevertheless, petitioner presents a                  
               scenario in support of the exchange argument in which                  
               the core is provided simultaneously.  Petitioner has                   
               not established in the record that such a scenario is                  
               treated any differently than a normal core acquisition.                
               It is instructive to consider the scenario wherein                     
               Consolidated knows, at the time that a remanufactured                  
               part is sold, that the customer cannot provide a core.                 
               The stipulated facts indicate the customer would still                 
               pay the core amount although there is no possible core                 
               return to be "secured".                                                
                    Petitioner's argument that it acquires cores in an                
               integrated transaction does not comport with the facts.                
               Consolidated's customers are not required to provide a                 
               core.  The remanufactured part is not sold to the                      
               customer contingent upon a core being provided.  There                 




Page:  Previous  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011