Antonio T. Croteau - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         

          includible in the gross income of the recipient under section 71.           
          Neither section 215 nor section 71 applies if the spouses file a            
          joint return.  Sec. 71(e).                                                  
               Section 71(b)(1) defines the term "alimony or separate main-           
          tenance payment" to mean any cash payment if--                              
                    (A) such payment is received by (or on behalf of)                 
               a spouse under a divorce or separation instrument,                     
                    (B) the divorce or separation instrument does not                 
               designate such payment as a payment which is not                       
               includible in gross income under this section and not                  
               allowable as a deduction under section 215,                            
                    (C) in the case of an individual legally separated                
               from his spouse under a decree of divorce or of sepa-                  
               rate maintenance, the payee spouse and the payor spouse                
               are not members of the same household at the time such                 
               payment is made, and                                                   
                    (D) there is no liability to make any such payment                
               for any period after the death of the payee spouse and                 
               there is no liability to make any payment (in cash or                  
               property) as a substitute for such payments after the                  
               death of the payee spouse.                                             
               Petitioner contends that during 1993 he made payments                  
          totaling $33,8923 to or on behalf of Ms. Croteau, which consti-             
          tute alimony or separate maintenance payments as defined in                 
          section 215(b).  All but $1,000 of the total payments claimed by            
          petitioner were made by checks that are part of the record in               
          this case.  Petitioner contends that he made the remaining $1,000           
          payment in cash.  Except for his uncorroborated, self-serving               

          3  Although petitioner claimed a total alimony deduction of                 
          $34,368 in his 1993 return, he conceded at trial that he is not             
          entitled to $476 of that amount.                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011