Linda S. Dillon - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

                                       OPINION                                        
               Generally, spouses who file joint tax returns are jointly              
          and severally liable for Federal income tax due on their combined           
          incomes.  Sec. 6013(d)(3); Guth v. Commissioner, 897 F.2d 441,              
          442 (9th Cir. 1990), affg. T.C. Memo. 1987-522.  However,                   
          pursuant to section 6013(e)(3), an "innocent spouse" can be                 
          relieved of tax liability.                                                  
               For petitioner to qualify as an innocent spouse, she must              
          establish:  (1) A joint return was filed for each year in issue;            
          (2) there were substantial understatements of tax attributable to           
          grossly erroneous items of her spouse in the return; (3) in                 
          signing the returns, she did not know or have reason to know of             
          the substantial understatements; and (4) taking into account all            
          the facts and circumstances, it would be inequitable to hold her            
          liable for the deficiencies and additions to tax.  Sec.                     
          6013(e)(1)(A) through (D); Guth v. Commissioner, supra at 443.              
          Petitioner has the burden of proving each element of section                
          6013(e) by a preponderance of the evidence.  Rule 142(a).  Since            
          the elements are conjunctive, the failure to prove any one of the           
          elements will preclude petitioner from receiving relief.  Stevens           
          v. Commissioner, 872 F.2d 1499, 1504 (11th Cir. 1989), affg. T.C.           
          Memo. 1988-63.                                                              
               Respondent concedes that a joint return was filed for each             
          of the years in issue, and thus the first element is not in                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011