- 6 - Petitioners maintained complete records of their expenses from their horse breeding and horse racing activities during the years 1988 through 1996. Petitioners personally keep the books and pay the bills in their horse breeding and horse racing activities. Neither petitioner nor Anna Dishal (Mrs. Dishal) has ever been engaged in any farming, breeding, or racing business other than the horse activities in which they have been engaged between 1976 and 1996. Neither petitioner nor Mrs. Dishal rides horses at all. Between 1989 and 1996, petitioners had income from purses from horse races, sales of horses to third parties, from breeders' awards, and from owners' awards. OPINION The Commissioner's determinations are presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving otherwise. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Section 183 (a) generally limits the amount of expenses that a taxpayer may deduct with respect to an activity "not engaged in for profit" to the deductions provided in section 183(b). Section 183 (b) (1) provides that deductions which would be allowable without regard to whether such activity is engaged in for profit are to be allowed. Section 183(b)(2) further provides that deductions which would be allowable only if such activity were engaged in for profit are to be allowed, but only to the extent that, the gross incomePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011