- 12 - sale of the property for which petitioners received the second deed as long-term capital gain and not as ordinary income. Petitioners also maintained outside employment and reported wages for 1992 and 1993 in the amounts of $91,343.65 and $34,821.17, respectively. While petitioner participated in the purchase, renovation, management, rental, and sale of his property, he has not shown that he was engaged in the trade or business of selling real estate or in any other real estate business during the years in issue. From this record, it appears that petitioner engaged in the activities for investment purposes. Since petitioner's activities do not rise to the level of a trade or business within the intent and meaning of section 162(a), petitioners' legal expenses from years 1992 and 1993 are not deductible as business expenses attributable to an active trade or business. Petitioners further contend that respondent previously treated petitioner's activities as an active trade or business for purposes of examinations conducted in 1989, 1990, and 1991. The parties have stipulated that The petitioners' income tax returns had been audited for 1989, 1990 and 1991; the activities of * * * [petitioner] were treated by the auditors at that time as an active trade or business for purposes of the audit, which did not involve issues related to taking a bad-debt deduction. Each tax year stands on its own and must be separately considered. United States v. Skelly Oil Co., 394 U.S. 678, 684Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011