- 10 - 1989 in the Answer and, thus, has the burden of proof on this issue. Rule 142(a). An unsigned Form 1040 is not a valid return. Cupp v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 68, 78 (1975), affd. without published opinion 559 F.2d 1207 (3d Cir. 1977); Kelly v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1987-352, affd. without published opinion 858 F.2d 743 (11th Cir. 1988). Petitioner's failure to file a valid tax return for 1989 was not due to reasonable cause. Rather, petitioner enclosed a letter with the return that stated he intentionally did not sign his return based on tax protester arguments. Moreover, petitioner admitted that he knew these arguments have been repeatedly rejected by this Court as frivolous. Accordingly, petitioner is liable for a section 6651(a)(1) addition to tax for 1989. Respondent determined that petitioner also failed to file returns for 1990, 1991, and 1992 and that for these years the failure to file was fraudulent. Where a taxpayer's failure to file a return is fraudulent, the addition to tax is equal to 15 percent of the tax due for each month that the return is delinquent, up to a maximum of 75 percent. Sec. 6651(f)(1) and (2). Petitioner contends that the two sets of Forms 1040NR and the "Statements in Lieu of Return" constitute valid tax returns for purposes of section 6651.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011