Dale Reid Edmonds - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

          certificate of deposit (CD) at Asheville Savings.  Petitioner was           
          required to pay a penalty of $115 to Asheville Savings because of           
          the premature withdrawal of funds from his CD.  Petitioner claims           
          that he did not owe any unpaid Federal income taxes for 1985;               
          however, at the time of trial, petitioner had been unsuccessful             
          in recouping the $1,562 that he alleges was wrongfully seized by            
          respondent.                                                                 
               On the joint Federal income tax return filed by petitioner             
          and his wife for 1994,2 petitioner reported $65,514 in wage                 
          income, $139 in taxable interest income, $1,350 in taxable                  
          refunds of State and local income taxes, $1,800 in taxable                  
          pension income, and a $7,140 loss from rental real estate, for a            
          total income of $61,663.  Petitioner claimed a $2,000 deduction             
          for a contribution to an IRA and an $8,000 deduction for alimony            
          paid, resulting in an adjusted gross income of $51,663.                     
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                
          petitioner received $19 in unreported taxable interest income and           
          a $500 unreported taxable distribution from an IRA, based on                
          information reported to respondent by the payor.  Respondent also           
          disallowed petitioner's $2,000 IRA contribution deduction and               
          made computational adjustments to petitioner's miscellaneous                
          itemized deductions.  Respondent allowed petitioner a $115                  

          2                                                                           
               Although the notice of deficiency was issued to petitioner             
          and his wife, the petition was filed only by petitioner.                    
          Petitioner's wife is not a party in this proceeding.                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011