Mehran Etesam - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          income, reduced the standard deduction, and determined the tax on           
          the basis of the filing status of married-filing-separately.  If            
          we determine that petitioner was not entitled to use the joint              
          filing status, he does not dispute the other adjustments.                   
               Section 6013(a) allows a husband and wife to file a joint              
          return.  Both the husband and wife must intend that a return                
          filed be treated as a joint return, and the question of their               
          intent is a question of fact.  Estate of Campbell v.                        
          Commissioner, 56 T.C. 1, 12 (1971); Springmann v. Commissioner,             
          T.C. Memo. 1987-474.  While Ms. Chasevi may have intended to file           
          a joint return for 1993 at some time during 1993 or early 1994,             
          by the time petitioner filed the return in 1995, she clearly did            
          not intend that return to be a joint return.  Indeed, she had               
          already filed a separate return.                                            
               Petitioner argues that the communications between his wife             
          and him during late 1993 or early 1994 gave rise to a binding               
          contract with Ms. Chasevi to the effect that they would file a              
          joint return.  While we have grave doubts concerning the                    
          existence of any such contract under the circumstances here, even           
          if Ms. Chasevi breached that contract, the fact remains that when           
          the purported joint return was filed, she did not intend that               
          return to be a joint return.  If there were a contract, that                
          would be a matter between petitioner and Ms. Chasevi.  Whatever             
          the resolution of that dispute, it would not affect the result              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011