Daniel L. Fa'asamala and Yvette S. Fa'asamala - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          compute petitioners' tax liability.  All required information was           
          supplied, including the attachment of petitioners’ Forms W-2                
          reflecting the amount of wages and withholding tax, petitioners’            
          marital and filing status, and the names and ages of their                  
          dependents.  Petitioners, however, placed zero in each place                
          provided for income items on the face of their Form 1040.  Their            
          resulting tax was also shown as zero, and they claimed a refund             
          of the $7,819.21 in combined withholdings and an additional                 
          $20,000 shown as attributable to 1995 estimated tax payments.               
               Petitioners did not have any estimated tax payments, so                
          respondent refunded most of the $7,819.21 to petitioners and                
          credited the remainder to a prior year's outstanding tax                    
          liability.  Petitioners also attached to their return several               
          pages of material that they had prepared from the research and              
          lecture handouts, explaining why they were not liable for tax.              
          The $20,000 amount shown as estimated payment was explained by              
          petitioners as the amount they had computed representing the                
          extra tax they had paid since 1990 solely because they had become           
          married.                                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               We found petitioners to be forthright and honest in their              
          testimony.  It is also obvious that they were cooperative and               
          responsive to respondent’s agent’s examination of their tax                 
          return and inquiries.  Additionally, petitioners’ concern about             
          the “marriage penalty” is currently a matter which is being                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011