- 6 - with section 274(d).3 On this record, we believe that petitioner has, by means of the receipts, Conference itinerary, and other Conference materials introduced into evidence, substantiated all of the expenses found to be ordinary and necessary above, see sec. 1.274-5T(c)(3)(i), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46020 (Nov. 6, 1985), except the delegation fee. Under section 274(d), one of the elements that the taxpayer must prove with respect to an expenditure for travel away from home is the Amount of each separate expenditure for traveling away from home, such as cost of transportation or lodging, except that the daily cost of the traveler’s own breakfast, lunch, and dinner and of expenditures incidental to such travel may be aggregated, if set forth in reasonable categories, such as for meals, for gasoline and oil, and for taxi fares. [Sec. 1.274- 5T(b)(2)(i), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).] Petitioner indicated on the Conference materials she introduced into evidence that the delegation fee covered some meals during the Conference. We also note that although petitioner spent 12 days in China in connection with the Conference, there is no stated expense for lodging. Likewise, although Conference events occurred in four different cities, there is no stated expense for travel within China. Given that the delegation fee was $3,400, it is obvious that it covered more than meals. Based on the 3 Respondent has not challenged the expenses of the China trip under sec. 274(c), (h), (m)(2), or (n). We consequently do not address the extent to which these provisions may limit petitioner’s deductions.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011