- 2 - prescribed in section 7476(b)(5).1 Petitioner objects thereto. Petitioner alleges that a letter he wrote to the Internal Revenue Service should be considered his petition to this Court, and, if it is not, that equitable considerations support denying respondent's motion. Background Linscott, Haylett, Wimmer & Wheat, P.C. (the Company), maintains a profit-sharing plan named the Linscott, Haylett, Wimmer & Wheat, P.C. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the Plan). On May 13, 1997, the District Director of the Midstates Key District of the Internal Revenue Service (the District Director) issued the Company a final determination letter stating that the Company's "termination of * * * [the Plan] did not adversely affect its qualification for Federal tax purposes." The letter also reminded the Company about certain filing obligations that it had in connection with the Plan and listed the name, address, and phone number of a person to contact for information concerning the letter. The District Director mailed a copy of the final determination letter to petitioner on the same day. Enclosed with this copy was another letter from the District Director stating in relevant part: 1 Section references are to the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011