- 3 - petitioner.2 Among assets distributed to petitioner were four parcels of real property located in Sacramento, California (the properties). On petitioner's 1986 individual Federal income tax return that was filed on April 15, 1987, petitioner reported a total cumulative net value of $147,262 for the properties and other assets she received on liquidation of LY Enterprises, a basis of $75,000 for her stock in LY Enterprises and a capital gain of $72,262 relating to the liquidating distribution she received from LY Enterprises. In 1987, petitioner contributed the properties that she received in 1986 on liquidation of LY Enterprises to the Lily Company, a California limited partnership in which petitioner owned a partnership interest (the Lily Partnership). On the Lily Partnership’s 1989 U.S. Partnership Return of Income (Form 1065), based upon total claimed depreciable tax bases of $1,912,764 in the properties, a total depreciation expense of $89,285 was claimed relating to the properties. On her individual 1989 Federal income tax return, petitioner claimed a proportionate share of the $89,285 depreciation expense 2 The distribution appears to have been made to a revocable trust that petitioner established. The parties herein and the Court treat the properties as if distributed directly to petitioner, and we make no further reference to petitioner’s revocable trust.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011