Robert C. Fors and Lucille Fors - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          which he showed to her shortly before trial.  Based on her review           
          of his records and his statements during the examination, Ms.               
          Coopersmith testified that she determined that petitioner was not           
          entitled to a deduction for meals and entertainment expenses in             
          excess of the amount allowed in the statutory notice of                     
          deficiency.  Respondent submitted a computer printout of the                
          results of Ms. Coopersmith's examination as part of the record in           
          this case; she stated to the Court that the computer printout was           
          her summary of the amounts substantiated by petitioner and                  
          allowed by her.                                                             
               After reviewing the daily planner and the weekly charts,               
          examining petitioner's records, and listening to petitioner's               
          testimony, we find that Ms. Coopersmith correctly concluded that            
          the meals and entertainment expenses allowed in the statutory               
          notice of deficiency equal or exceed the amount substantiated by            
          petitioner's records and statements.  It appears from the record            
          that respondent went to great lengths to sort through                       
          petitioner's assorted records only a week before the trial in an            
          effort to allow petitioner all of the deductions to which he was            
          entitled.  Petitioner's records do not support a finding                    
          different from respondent's determination, and he failed to                 
          provide any testimony which convinces us that respondent erred in           
          his determination.  We therefore hold that petitioner is not                
          entitled to a Schedule C deduction for meals and entertainment              
          expenses in excess of the amount allowed by respondent.                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011