- 28 - for the Onondaga property. In the notice of deficiency, respondent limited the deductions to 50 percent of each of the outstanding mortgages. Section 2053(a)(4) generally provides that a deduction is allowable for the amount of unpaid mortgage on property where the value of decedent's interest therein is included in the value of the gross estate. Section 20.2053-7, Estate Tax Regs., provides that a deduction is allowed if the value of the property, undiminished by the amount of the mortgage or indebtedness, is included in the value of the gross estate. Generally, in the case of joint tenancy real property, the amount deductible from a decedent's estate is limited to the portion of the mortgage which the estate is obligated to pay. Parrott v. Commissioner, 30 F.2d 792 (9th Cir. 1929), affg. 7 B.T.A. 134 (1927). Both decedent and Ms. Friedeberg signed the note and deed of trust securing the note for the Dolores property. Similarly, both decedent and Ms. Friedeberg signed the promissory note as part of the purchase of the Onondaga property. Petitioner does not argue that under California law the estate is ultimately obligated to pay more than one-half of the outstanding date-of- death mortgage balances upon the Dolores and Onondaga properties. Therefore, we sustain respondent's determination that petitioner is entitled to deduct 50 percent of the date-of-death balances ofPage: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011