Richard A. Frey - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          doubt the quality, extensiveness, or fairness of procedures                 
          followed in prior litigation."  Montana v. United States, supra             
          at 164 n.11.  Petitioner has offered no evidence that either the            
          complexity or the quantity of the counts in the prior criminal              
          indictment affected adversely the quality, extensiveness, or                
          fairness of the prior criminal procedure.  We find that no                  
          special circumstances exist warranting any exception, and                   
          petitioner has not directed our attention to any change in                  
          controlling facts or legal principles since the first judgment.             
          Thus, the only question we must resolve is whether the issues               
          involved in the instant case are sufficiently similar to those              
          resolved in the criminal proceeding so as to warrant the                    
          application of collateral estoppel.                                         
               It is well established that a conviction for Federal income            
          tax evasion, either upon a plea of guilty or upon a jury verdict,           
          conclusively establishes fraud in a subsequent civil tax fraud              
          proceeding through application of the doctrine of collateral                
          estoppel.  DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 858, 885-886 (1991),              
          affd. 959 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992); Gray v. Commissioner, 708 F.2d            
          243, 246 (6th Cir. 1983), affg. T.C. Memo. 1981-1.  The elements            
          of criminal tax evasion and civil tax fraud are identical.  Gray            
          v. Commissioner, supra; Hicks Co. v. Commissioner, 470 F.2d 87,             
          90 (1st Cir. 1972), affg. 56 T.C. 982 (1971).                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011