- 13 -
that the Nirschls never executed either, and, consequently, there
was no settlement of their case.8
To reflect the foregoing,
An appropriate order will be
issued denying the Nirschls'
motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction.
8
We leave for a subsequent opinion the question whether
the Nirschls may be entitled to consistent settlement terms
pursuant to sec. 6224(c)(2) and sec. 301.6224(c)-3T, Temporary
Proced. & Admin. Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 6787 (Mar. 5, 1987).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Last modified: May 25, 2011