- 13 - that the Nirschls never executed either, and, consequently, there was no settlement of their case.8 To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order will be issued denying the Nirschls' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 8 We leave for a subsequent opinion the question whether the Nirschls may be entitled to consistent settlement terms pursuant to sec. 6224(c)(2) and sec. 301.6224(c)-3T, Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 6787 (Mar. 5, 1987).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Last modified: May 25, 2011