Robert A. Hall and Laverne M. Hall - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          annuity".  Sec. 1.72-1(b), Income Tax Regs.  The transcript of              
          account shows that the payments received by petitioner were not             
          periodic or regular.  Petitioner's payments were section 72                 
          payments not received as an annuity.                                        
               Petitioners distributions were received before the section             
          72(c)(4) "annuity starting date".  For payments not received as             
          an annuity, section 72(e)(2)(B) provides that, for distributions            
          received before the annuity starting date, the distributee is               
          entitled to exclude from income any part of the distribution that           
          is allocable to the "investment in the contract" as defined in              
          section 72(e)(6).  Amounts allocable to income on the contract              
          are on the other hand, includable in gross income.  Sec.                    
          72(e)(2)(B), (5)(D), (8)(A) and (B).  In order to determine the             
          investment in the contract, the premiums or other consideration             
          paid for the contract must be calculated.  Sec. 72(e)(6).                   
               Premiums or Other Consideration Paid                                   
               Under section 72(f), employees generally are given credit              
          only for nondeductible premiums or other consideration that they            
          have contributed for purposes of computing the "investment in the           
          contract" under section 72(e)(6).4  See Campbell v. Commissioner,           
          108 T.C. 54, 66 (1997); Patrick v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-           
          30.  Amounts, however, contributed by the employer are also to be           

               4Under prior law, an individual would never have an                    
          "investment in the contract" or "basis" in an IRA.  See Campbell            
          v. Commissioner, 108 T.C. 54, 64-66 (1997).                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011