William O. Harrison - Page 30

                                       - 30 -                                         

                  measuring, weighing or the like.  A rough or                        
                  approximate calculation only."  Black's Law                         
                  Dictionary, 494 (5th ed. 1979).                                     
                       To require exactitude in the estimation                        
                  called for under section 1.6081-4(a)(4), Income                     
                  Tax Regs., would be unreasonable.  The taxpayer                     
                  would have no need for an extension of time                         
                  within which to file his return if he could                         
                  determine his true tax liability at the time                        
                  he submits the Form 4868.  The mere fact that                       
                  petitioners underestimated their 1981 and 1982                      
                  tax liabilities, standing alone, does not cause                     
                  their applications to be invalid and the auto-                      
                  matic extensions to be void.  See Hudspeth v.                       
                  Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1985-628.                                  

             Id. at 906-907; see also Arnaiz v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.              
             1992-729.  ("The mere fact that petitioners in fact                      
             underestimated their 1985 tax finally shown to be due does               
             not mean that they did not properly estimate their tax; the              
             standard is whether they made a 'bona fide and reasonable                
             attempt' to secure information   * * * necessary to make a               
             'bona fide' and reasonable estimate' of their tax                        
             liabilities.  Crocker v. Commissioner, supra at 907-908.")               
                  Respondent's position that petitioners' allegations                 
             "are not supported by any evidence" disregards the evidence              
             advanced by petitioners, consisting of Mr. Harrison's                    
             testimony, the testimony of his bookkeeper, Ms. Cates, and               
             the testimony of the certified public accountants,                       
             Mr. Whittington and Ms. Ruble, whom petitioners retained                 
             to prepare and submit their income tax returns.  We found                






Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011