- 2 - The issue for decision is whether a notice of deficiency was issued and properly mailed to petitioners for the year 1992. According to respondent, on October 2, 1996, a notice of deficiency in which a deficiency, additions to tax, and a penalty with respect to petitioners' 1992 Federal income tax were determined was issued and sent to petitioners by certified mail. Petitioners admit that a document sent by respondent by certified mail was received in October 1996 but they claim that the document was not a notice of deficiency. According to petitioners, the document was a statement of income tax changes that they had previously received from the revenue agent conducting the examination of their 1992 year. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. Petitioners were husband and wife during 1992. They filed a timely joint Federal income tax return for the year 1992 on or about October 15, 1993. References to petitioner are to Walter J. Hoyt IV. Petitioners resided in Willows, California, at the time their 1992 return was filed and continued to reside there at least until the petition was filed in this case. The parties have stipulated, and we find as a fact, that for purposes of section 6212, petitioners' last known address as of October 2, 1996, was P.O. Box 642, Willows, California 95988.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011